SMD vs. COB vs. MiP: LED प्रदर्शन प्रौद्योगिकी मध्ये बाजार हिस्सा का आंतरिक रूपांतर (2025 रिपोर्ट)

Executive Summary

The LED display industry is undergoing a seismic shift. In Q1 2025, SMD (Surface-Mounted Device) technology’s market share fell to 77.6% (down 2% YoY), while COB (Chip-on-Board) surged to 22.1% 4. और . This report explores the drivers behind this trend amongSMD vs. COB vs. MiP , compares the technologies, and forecasts their future roles.1. Market Share Analysis: Why SMD Is Losing Ground

1.1 The Decline of SMD

SMD has dominated LED displays for decades due to its

mature supply chain cost efficiency 4. और micro-pitch displays(below P1.2) are becoming apparent: Pixel density limits : SMD’s single-pixel packaging struggles with pitches below

• P1.0Higher maintenance costs : Annual upkeep averages.

• 2.3× more than COBProduction bottlenecks : Achieving finer pitches requires expensive upgrades..

• 1.2 The Rise of COB and MiPMetric

SMD

: Average COB product prices fell:

• 31.4% YoY in 2025: No exposed wires, reducing failure rates.

• MiP’s niche advantagesFlip-chip design : Enables.

• Durabilitybetter thermal management

Micro LED compatibility:

• : Critical forP0.9 and below applications. 4. और 2.1 COB: The Micro-Pitch Leader.

• Key innovationsDirect PCB bonding : Eliminates SMD’s lamp bead packaging, reducing dead pixels

ghosting

Seamless displays

: No gaps between pixels, ideal for:

• 4K/8K video wallsCase study : Leyard’s COB-P0.9 displays now power 4. और Limitations.

• Color consistency: Challenging in large-screen splicing. Repairability.

• : Damaged modules often require full replacement.2.2 MiP: The High-End Disruptor Why MiP wins in premium markets.

Higher yields:

• 20% betterthan traditional Micro LED at P0.6-P0.9 pitches.

• “Zero defects”: Eliminates SMD’s

caterpillar effect

(black-line failures).:

• XR applications: : Used in 90% of Hollywood virtual production stages

• (e.g., Disney’sMandolorian Adoption barriers : Still

• 3-5× pricierthan SMD at equivalent pitches. Scalability : Requires 10,000+ nits).

for outdoor use.:

• 28. लागत3.1 Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis Cost Factor Initial Cost (P1.2)

• $800/m²$1,200/m² $3,500/m² 5-Year Maintenance

$400/m²

$170/m²

now offer:

• COB-backed MiPP0.4-P0.6

• displays.SMD’s last stand IMD (Integrated Mounted Device).

tech extends its life in

P1.5-P2.5

• markets.4.2 Emerging Applications Technology Growth Segment 2025-2030 CAGR Advances in Cinematic VR (90%) Outdoor Advertising (60%)

• 4.3 The AI Wildcard: Machine learning : Compensates for COB’s color drift in real-time (e.g., Google’s DeepColor SDK Predictive maintenance

: Cuts MiP’s downtime by

50%+ of P0.7-P1.2

• by 2026.: Dominates P0.4-P0.9).

• for metaverse/medical imaging.Recommendations for Buyers 40% Choose SMD for

: High-brightness outdoor screens (>P2.0).

Opt for COB for : Boardrooms, broadcast (P0.9-P1.5).Invest in MiP for

• YoY ChangeIndustry Verdict “COB and MiP are the future, but SMD won’t retire quietly.” —

• MiP, MIT DisplayLab Reference source: The Proportion of Sales Continues to Expand, COB/MiP Is Eroding the SMD Display Application Market

• Technology Shifts:: विभाजित P0.4-P0.9 मेटावर्स/मेडिकल इमेजिंग के लिए.

खरीदारों के लिए सिफारिश:

• SMD को चुनें: उच्च चमकीलाई आउटडोर स्क्रीन्स (>P2.0).

• COB को चुनें: बोर्डरूम, प्रसारण (P0.9-P1.5).

• MiP में निवेश करें: आभासी उत्पादन, शल्य दर्शन.

उद्योग का फैसला: “COB और MiP भविष्य हैं, लेकिन SMD चुपचाप विराम नहीं लेगा.”
— डॉ. लिसा चेन, MIT DisplayLab

संदर्भ स्रोत: बिक्री की हिस्सेदारी लगातार बढ़ रही है, COB/MiP SMD डिस्प्ले अनुप्रयोग बाजार को क्षतिग्रस्त कर रहे हैं